Gizmo Cafe Blog

Sony Breaking Up With PS3 Cell Processor this Valentine’s Day

There’s even more bad news for Sony, it seems.  After marketing the PlayStation 3 with a sheer muscle ad campaign, the company is now clearly regretting its production of the Cell processor, considered by many to be the heart of the console.  In fact, executive management is discussing possible plans to pull out of Cell processor production altogether.

When pressured by reporters for an explanation to Sony’s considerable 5% decline in quarterly profits (semiconductor division), Executive Deputy President Yutaka Nakagawa excitedly blamed the loss on the Cell processor’s expensive production costs.  With the processor set to move from fabrication with 90 nm lithography to 65 nm or even 45 nm (in accordance with IBM standards), Nakagawa also told reporters that Sony would not be bearing the burden of these transition costs. 

The PlayStation 3 was intended to be the Cell processor’s “coming out” party.  With Sony dominating the video game console market for two full generations, there was little doubt that both the system and its hardware would win over a riled-up fan base.  Unfortunately, partially because of the processor’s cost and the inclusion of a pricey Blu-ray high definition DVD player, the PS3 has sold very poorly.  Few gamers are willing to shell out $500 or $600 for a console that has few games meeting the quality of competition from Nintendo or Microsoft.

The news doesn’t necessarily mean Sony is giving up on the Cell processor, which will likely still worm its way into the (slow) parade of PlayStation 3s.  Instead, speculation is that Sony will contract out the chip’s production, an approach taken by other major tech companies like nVidia and Texas Instruments.

At the moment, IBM appears to be the most new suitor for the Cell processor.  However, it’s fairly apparent that Sony is desperate to sell production; that means the pain bestowed upon the company’s semiconductor division may pale in comparison to the poor jerks in accounting.

Shop Now for PlayStation 3

Published Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:00 by Brando

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Scott said:

I still don't get it.  I live in Southern California and simply cannot walk into store to buy a PS3 (Best Buy, Target, Wal-Mart).  Amazon.com still does not stock it, yet everyone is saying that it is selling poorly?  I think everyone is just on the Wii bandwagon (which I do own) and are bashing the PS3 because of price.  How many of you guys really have one?

The Wii is a great machine, but it's graphics sucks on HDTV's, how come no one brings this up?  Unless many people who are bashing the PS3 doesn't own an HDTV to realize this.  Again the Wii is a great machine, but it is heavily lacking in graphics, but everyone is so quick to bash the PS3.
February 14, 2007 11:45
 

dean bottrill said:

dont belive the microsoft propagander, belive sony in 1 yrs time.
February 14, 2007 11:47
 

John said:

Wow, talk about bias.  Is Microsoft giving you free laptops or something?  Bribing you in the way of advertisements or free 360 games maybe?

The PS3 has sold more units in the same time after it's launch than the XBox 360 did after their launch.

The news isn't bad news for Sony, it's good news that they are trying to reduce costs.  Isn't that what all businesses do?

Also, the PS3 is approximately the same price as an XBox 360 if you factor in the cost of online services.  With the 360, you have to pay $50/month and over 4 years it adds up to be more than the PS3.  Include a HD-DVD and it's over $200 more expensive than the high-end PS3.

As for games, the games will starting coming in March.  Microsoft had around the same number of games after it's launch as well.

Stop it with the FUD.  Microsoft is good at generating FUD, but that doesn't mean you have to do their work for them.
February 14, 2007 12:01 PM
 

123 said:

F this
February 14, 2007 12:10 PM
 

John said:

The PS3 is starting go the way of the Neo Geo, Jaguar, Turbo Graphics 16, and Atari LYNX.  You may say what dose the PS3 have in common with those systems.  They were also the fastest of there Generation's console type, and also had no real software support.  I have no doubt that Sony will sink money into the PS3 until they call it a success, but who really believe the BS Sony feeds the public.  BlueRay depends on PS3 success and Sony=BlueRay.  I can’t wait to see HD-DVD destroy BR.  Sony is not allowing the porn industry to use BR copyrights HD-DVD is.  The same thing happened to VHS and Beta.
February 14, 2007 12:12 PM
 

xntrk said:

Sounds like Sony is abandoning their foster child because of it's high maintenance. It's alright though. I can see Sony moving towards something more realisitc, as the gaming industry wasn't really ready for the Cell Processor anyway.  Whatever they come up with next should be equivalent to Microsoft's and XBOX fans can now say, with honesty, that the XBOX is just as good as the PS3.  Sony rushed the PS3 and now they're paying for it, but then again, when hasn't Sony pushed the envelope of design and manufacturing? It's just their stigma.
February 14, 2007 12:33 PM
 

Damien said:

Seems like Sony is falling apart.  First the laptop batteries catching fire, then they lose the case involving their DRMed music CDs and are forced to pay millions, and now the Cell problems.  I guess it was only a matter of time before Sony came crashing down, they're basically the Japanese version of Apple.  Everything is proprietary, and they stick it to the consumer whenever they want.
February 14, 2007 1:05 PM
 

Anonymous PS fan 226 said:

I was seriously planning on buying a PS3, but now cos it's not selling and all I might buy a 360 instead it's just you have to PAY to play online so that puts me off a bit.

That Test Drive Unlimited game (I know its a few months old but **** it) that could actually be a system seller to me, also I could get Halo 3 see what thats like I've never played a Halo game online before. Gears of War don't look all that to me it just looks like a normal shooter but I would prolly get it anyway. 20GB ain't much for me (I DL ****loads of game demos).

I was a real Sony fanboy before but it's now become for me to like other systems as well (except Nintendo I HATE kiddie games) Nintendo shouldn't even be in the console war man.
February 14, 2007 1:17 PM
 

Charlie said:

"The PS3 is starting go the way of the Neo Geo, Jaguar, Turbo Graphics 16, and Atari LYNX.  You may say what dose the PS3 have in common with those systems.  They were also the fastest of there Generation's console type, and also had no real software support.  I have no doubt that Sony will sink money into the PS3 until they call it a success, but who really believe the BS Sony feeds the public.  BlueRay depends on PS3 success and Sony=BlueRay.  I can’t wait to see HD-DVD destroy BR.  Sony is not allowing the porn industry to use BR copyrights HD-DVD is.  The same thing happened to VHS and Beta."

Are you smoking crack?  Blu-ray Disc movies are outselling HD-DVD 2 to 1.
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/index.cfm?newsid=8302
There are more companies behind Blu-ray, the porn industry is behind blu-ray, go enjoy your Microsoft kickbacks fan boy.
February 14, 2007 1:25 PM
 

Mike said:

MSFT propaganda, how is this 'news' or relevant?
February 14, 2007 1:31 PM
 

xxxCoward said:

PS3 is availible everywhere in Central Canada.  I walked in to a Costco and saw around 30units on a HDTV display.  I have a 360 and am not baised towards MS, but if Sony does not get its act together then the PS3 will be like Sega dreamcast.

Just look how easy it is to make console games with the 360.  Download XNA express and 100bucks you can put your games up on the 360 dev net

February 14, 2007 1:32 PM
 

Wayde said:

Sonly pulling out of the Cell is big news! I've been interested in the fate of the Cell.

The Cell processor was actually a good idea. A multi-purpose media chip that can be mass produced for many devices including the current state of the art console. Pure genius if you ask me. There is no anti-Sony bias in that!

I believe the Cell will stay in circulation and used in cameras, DVD players, Blu-ray players etc.

Why are half you pussies so afraid of bias anyway? Opinions are just that, opinions. Expressing one's opinion no matter how unpopular is called cajones. You kids should un-suckle from your momma's tittie and grow a pair. How is a story about PS3 cell processor Microsoft propoganda?

I own an Xbox360 and I'm likely to buy a PS3 when the good games start rolling out (Tekken and Virtua Fighter) and I'll probably even buy some Blu-ray disks.
February 14, 2007 2:08 PM
 

Locke said:

"Sounds like Sony is abandoning their foster child because of it's high maintenance. It's alright though. I can see Sony moving towards something more realisitc, as the gaming industry wasn't really ready for the Cell Processor anyway.  Whatever they come up with next should be equivalent to Microsoft's and XBOX fans can now say, with honesty, that the XBOX is just as good as the PS3.  Sony rushed the PS3 and now they're paying for it, but then again, when hasn't Sony pushed the envelope of design and manufacturing? It's just their stigma."

Read the article.  PS3's aren't getting a different chip.  Sony wants to stop manufacturing the Cell and contract out the chips production.  Sorry, XBOX fanboys, I know you REALLY want to, but are never going to get to say the 360 is as good as the PS3...
February 14, 2007 2:08 PM
 

spw said:

this is getting pathetic... does anyone actually read the articles before writing their own uneducated summaries? pretty pathetic brando...
February 14, 2007 2:43 PM
 

Brando said:

Despite the furious defenses of Sony, the story is accurate and reports the contracting out of the Cell processor.  

If people have a problem with Sony's policy, that's fine to air here.  Considering the fact that Gizmo has spent plenty of time with the PlayStation 3 and believe its survival is critical for the advancement of the other consoles, we don't agree that this is a biased opinion.

News is news, but we like to offer some insight.  
February 14, 2007 2:59 PM
 

John said:

Brando, give me a break.  "but we like to offer some insight." -- Replace "insight" with "bias" and you've got it right.

Despite GizmoCafe's furious support of Microsoft's corporate line, the PS3 will do fine.  It's a better value than the 360, unless you don't play online, and don't want a HD player.

I guess Microsoft's advertising dollars are enough to buy your opinion eh?
February 14, 2007 3:12 PM
 

xntrk said:

Anonymous PS fan 226 made an excellent point; which I can assure you a large majority of people who keep up with tech new and wanted to buy a PS3 are thinking the same thing.

"Damn. Now I guess I'll get an 360 instead."

This shift in the balance of the force will leave a severe blemish on the face of gaming for Sony. Believe what you may, but only hardcore PlayStation fans will buy a PS3 from here on in. I wonder what will happen to all the bandwagon jumpers that spent over $800 on the anticipated release of what was to be the next biggest thing in gaming systems?  They'll just have to suck it up and hope that whatever comes next from Sony keeps their processors, pockets and compatibility in mind. Still makes me shake my head though, and regardless of the outcome, I'm still a PlayStation fan. XBOX 360 will continue to pound on the now cowering PS3 but it will all come "360º".  You can't deny the logic here, and for the general consumer it comes down to the 3P factors: Play, Price, Popularity. Rearranged in which ever order you choose, it will determine the fate the big 3 in gaming. Sony has taken two steps back to collect themselves. Though they will take a hit for 2007, the PS3 will come back as strong as ever.
February 14, 2007 3:39 PM
 

Wii-Master said:

Hey John. Lay off on the bias bashing buddy.  Just because Brando doesn't protray optimism in the situation that Sony is in, doesn't mean he's cheering the fall of the Cell Processor in the Sony PS3. And what opinion isn't biased one way or another. Don't make others verbatim be the bounding board for your "Holy Preaching". You're not stating anything new that hasn't been said already. Post something productive to the convo, and not just jibber-jabs at the editors.

We all know Sony will just toss a ton of dollars to rebuild their PS3 to and beyond the 360 because that's what they do.  He doesn't have to spell it out for you, regardless if his views might seem "Gate'd".
February 14, 2007 3:49 PM
 

The Truth said:

Brando, can you right the facts? The facts are that Sony doesn't want to invest in the hardware in building smaller cell processors.  Why? Because there are two companies that specialize in building processors in 65nm and 45nm.  It is cheaper to outsource then retool the production line.  I don't own any next gen console, but know BS when I read it.  Even the title is bad.  Breaking up? Outsourcing the production is more the truth.  No where in the article talks about outsourcing the production.  Bando made it seem like the cell processor was being completely abandoned.
February 14, 2007 3:56 PM
 

John said:

"And what opinion isn't biased one way or another."

That's a cop-out.  Some sources are more impartial and reputable than others.

"Don't make others verbatim be the bounding board for your "Holy Preaching". "

Just stating the facts.  If that sounds like "holy preaching" to you, maybe you ought to look at your own biases.

"Post something productive to the convo, and not just jibber-jabs at the editors."

It is productive.  I'm correcting the editor's biased arguments.  The editors are the ones that aren't "saying what hasn't been said before" - all those comments against Sony have been said by Peter Moore and the Microsoft gang repeatedly, along with their fanboys.

Well whatever works for this "blog" I guess.  They're a business, and they need to attract Microsoft's advertising dollars I guess, logic and impartiality be damned.
February 14, 2007 4:09 PM
 

mike said:

WOW. Just WOW. Talk about being able to slant a story. These people that hate the ps3 will stop at NOTHING. Even flat out lying.


Alot of companys use 3rd party foundrys (i.e. places that make cpu's) Companys like AMD, ATI, Nvidia. And Now sony.

Sony can right now make a 90nm cpu, and a 65nm cpu. The jump to 45nm is huge, and alot of companies have had problems making the transiation.

Foundries like TMSC Just make CPU's, and other IC. Thats ALL they do. They are some of the BEST in the world at doing it. The only company better at it is probably intel.

They also have invested millions in research and production capacity to make 45nm CPU's.

AMD Final had the money to expand their foundrys, and is able to take over some of the production from TMSC, this will give them better production control. Meanwhile TMSC and other foundries will have extra capacity to make chips. So they can bid. thats right BID on production of the Cell.

What does this mean? Sony will be able to get CHEAPER Cell CPU's. Who wouldn't do that?

PLus sony might not have a 45nm planet right now. And if its not scheduled to be built for a few years, they wont have it till then. But they want to speed up the move to 45nm production, so they get someone else to make the chips.

This is not a BAD thing. This is GOOD.
February 14, 2007 4:09 PM
 

xntrk said:

Locke ... Sorry to bust your bubble but my statement about the abandoned stepchild holds water. Read into the analogy my friend. I never stated they were changing it. And because I mentioned XBOX in my statement has nothing to do wtih me being a fan. Consider the facts: you can't deny Sony's rush of the PS3, their lack of long term projection on their products, nor the poor "http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70F16FE3E5B0C728FDDA80894DF404482" market number that Sony is pulling. I'm a long time Sony fan but I have a love-hate relationship for this company and I'm realistic, not optimistic. So don't yank your trousers too high up, because in the end my point was that this will always plague Sony as an revolutionary - they shoot too high too fast. When it works, BONUS! When it doesn't, backfire. Throw money at a problem and things get fixed whether you like the process or not.  Apple does it, Microsoft does it and it's a given fact that Sony will do it as well.
February 14, 2007 4:15 PM
 

Wii-Master said:

Yo The Truth ...
Are we reading the same article or is it that you're looking through somewhat blinded eyes.

"The news doesn’t necessarily mean Sony is giving up on the Cell processor, which will likely still worm its way into the (slow) parade of PlayStation 3s.  Instead, speculation is that Sony will contract out the chip’s production, an approach taken by other major tech companies like nVidia and Texas Instruments."

I think the statement in the articles suggests that your "outsourcing" is covered in the former quote. Something about "...contract out ...". Now unless it's just me, but in the English language that I believe you speak and read, that means the same thing, no? Stop finding holes to exploit.
February 14, 2007 4:24 PM
 

da *** said:

what should i get a ps3 that has 1 good game, but it is rather sexy.or x360 u can actually get one and has sweet games already out
February 14, 2007 5:13 PM
 

h said:

f u all
February 14, 2007 5:33 PM
 

phi said:

sigh you guys should look at the numbers

A. sony doesn't produce enough for the world period they were still far short of the promised 2million for christmas thats the reason why ps3s are hard to find cause there isn't that many produced (they blame manufacturing problems)

B. look at Ebgames they have lots and lots of ps3s siting on the shelves I can actually go and buy a ps3 20gig version if i wanted to in Kitchener waterloo
February 14, 2007 6:03 PM
 

Open Minded said:

"There’s even more bad news for Sony, it seems.  After marketing the PlayStation 3 with a sheer muscle ad campaign, the company is now clearly regretting its production of the Cell processor, considered by many to be the heart of the console.  In fact, executive management is discussing possible plans to pull out of Cell processor production altogether."

Just stop and step back for a minute - doesn't this paragraph look excessively negative??? I'd say so.

Also, didn't sony stop production of the PS2 chip as well to have it outsourced??? This just seems like logical business sense to lower production costs and make the PS3 cheaper (this happens in the life cycle of any gaming console).

Gee, the PS3 bashing is so intense these days...MS have done well.

For the record, i'm not a fanboy of PS3, 360 or Wii.
February 14, 2007 6:41 PM
 

Halcyon said:

I am not a huge Sony fan, but I dont want to see them fail, hell I may buy one myself. Currently I love my 360, and my girlfriend has a 360 and wants a Wii, but every time we want to try out a Ps3 at any given retailer, its either locked up or there is no controller.
February 14, 2007 7:14 PM
 

Sagarat said:

Where is the proof that the PS3 is selling poorly? It is selling just as fast as the X360 did at launch, and the PS3 is not even available in Europe just yet.
And if anyone talks about available stock, that is onlly because Sony now has the capacity to keep up with demand, whatever that demand may be.
February 14, 2007 7:25 PM
 

some ps3 fan said:

does this mean if the cell proccesor gets taken out will the graphics capibilities for the ps3 go down lower than 360?????
February 14, 2007 7:46 PM
 

ha ha said:

this is so funny..this article is reporting the same nws that i've read on several other publiscations, yet he';s the ONLY one to put a DOOMSDAY slant ON IT..they're cutting cost fo rthe consumer, he's making it look like future editions of the ps3 won't have a cell procssor..what an idiot.e
February 14, 2007 8:46 PM
 

hooha said:

460 = Ass.
February 14, 2007 10:00 PM
 

pete said:

I honestly dont see a lot of PS3s around, or maybe im just not looking hard enough cuz i already have one? but walmart, costco, circuit city, and best buys dont have it in my area.

how does this article convince anyone of not buying a ps3?

theyre just contracting the cells out instead of making it themselves

a lame excuse to not buy a ps3
February 14, 2007 10:55 PM
 

Damian said:

It's a good thing that Sony is outsourcing their Cell processors.  It will drive the price down of the unit in the near future which is a good thing.  Sony is not abandoning their chipset; they are just looking to the future for it.  On another point, I read above in some of the rants that Sony is not consumer friendly.  You can't get anymore non consumer friendly than M$ customer support, having to buy all the needed accessories for their system, that once you buy; you spend just as much for the 360 as you do for the PS3.  Even more so if the rumored Black Xbox 360 does come out this year.
February 14, 2007 11:30 PM
 

Chris said:

I am the electronic team leader at my local Target we currently have four PS3's instock. We got a shipment of 32 Wii's in which all were sold in one day while only two ps3 were sold. I actually have all three consoles and so far the ps3 is least played. The xbox360 is the best so far with the wii in close second.
February 15, 2007 12:38
 

masta said:

I have both the PS3 and the 360... let me break it down.

360= great online, at the moment PS3 cannot touch it...
Games: they just started rolling out games, I got it at launch and every single game i got with it sucked!!! with the exception of GRAW every game sucked on the 360 until the christmas season, where we got GOW, RS Vegas and all those games.

The background downloading.. did not have it at launch and took some time to get (PS3 should have had it out the gate though) Upcoming games... well I dont dig FPS games that much, and crackdown looks crap, I never played any Halo games to be honest (probably cause it's an FPS) Bioshock, the trailer doesn't look all that fun.. at least the one I downloaded.. (another FPS, probably the reason) Masseffect looks awesome!, monster madness ...crap!, armored core...more crap, there is no great games coming to it.

PS3= online is crap.. straight up, if there is anything that the 360 will always have over the ps3 is the online, downloads take for ever, region restrictions on some games while online, same cheap ass demos, cant invite those on your buddy list in some games, no voice chat on some games.... it's inferior to the 360 online.

Games: at the moment, not that many great games, but I bought this thing alone just for Motorstorm and Heveanly sword.. the 360 has nothing like heveanly sword.. no action game in the 360 is packing that much action... ohhh another thing.. resistance online does kill alllllllllll the COD games, i have both 2 &3 for the 360.. and the 40 player experience kills them.. it also runs a lot faster.. COD is crap compared.

PS3 is a quieter system, easier to get vidoes going, I got all the episodes of lost and heroes on it with no problem ( the whole streaming on the 360 requires to much bullshit, a tv tuner card, media center on your PC, to much *** to get a video going). The PS3 truly is an all in one entertainment system, blueray.. yeah it set the price up.. but come on.. it's the ***! Wifi built in.. (for the 360 I had to buy that USB dongle... 90 something bucks for it)...One thing I dont dig.. it's kind of big, I always made fun of the first XBOX for being so damn big.. I think MS did a better job this time, the PS3.. to damn big.. I also wanted the silver one as it will match with my TV.. dont know why the hell we only got black ones at launch.

Over all, I at the moment have more time with my PS3, after GOW and rainbow six, there is not much to play.. i have Lost Planet, but it's irritating at times, so  I really haven't got into it the AI on the game is bogus, they just stand there and the big ass monsters at times get out of hand just to kill em.... I do enjoy the easiness of the 360 I have my brother on there, and any game we throw up we have voice chat.. he does not have a PS3 yet, but it will suck even if he did as some games dont support voice chat...

Over all, if you are an online games junky.. go with the 360.. no doubt about it.. if you are in it to play games, enovative, not a million FPS games... get a PS3... The PS3 is not going to rule this generation for that same reason, there are people that love online gaming..
February 15, 2007 2:30
 

Tim said:

If there's such bad news for SONY, how come SONY stock just reached highest in 4 years:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=ajbKoZXI2hOk&refer=japan

6 Ghz version of Cell coming.
February 15, 2007 3:08
 

Zumbi said:

WOW I can't believe the crap I read these days.

 They just started mass producing the 65nm cell's. Which means smaller, faster, better average speed in a batch.

 They also will be removing the PS2's Emotion Engine and Graphics Synthesizer soon. All backwards compatability will be thru the Cell. Which means it will be cheaper for them to produce.

AS for the ones saying it isn't selling. I still haven't seen one on a shelf since I got mine in December. I visit 10 various walmart/kmart/eb/target stores weekly looking for another one.

 The game selection is going to double by the end of march, with some good titles and a few exclusives. So hope and hate all you want but the PS3 isn't going away anytime soon. Let alone the Cell.
February 15, 2007 3:09
 

Scorn said:

Reporting this is fine but report the news in the correct way for God sake,

Sony are not pulling out of the manufacture of the chips because of the poor sales of the PS3, this is just 360 fan boy speculation, the PS3 is sold out everywhere.

Sony are considering pulling out of chip manufacture due to the high capital investment required to manufacture chips at the 45NM level. It may be more cost effective to outsource the manufacture to a company that already has the kit in place.

Report the news *** not speculation and your own personal slant
February 15, 2007 3:25
 

Tim said:

Personally I just use last year for reference. I wanted a 360 last year at this time (tax rebate came back) and I couldn't find one until mid March. I've seen PS3s in stock at every Wal-Mart in my area since Jan. So like I said, that's how I'm judging demand.
February 15, 2007 9:22
 

Alan said:

The first poster mentioned their were no PS3's available in Southern California.   Where I live they are available everywhere.   Toys R Us has 6, Best Buy at least 20 maybee more.   Circuit city 10.   EB games has 3.   Everyone of those stores I have been in, I have asked how are the PS3's selling, they say not at all.   We have had the same units for a month.    

Toys R Us told me they sold one in the past month, but it was returned unopened after the person who bought it could not sell it for a profit on EBAY.
February 17, 2007 10:43
 

Gizmo Cafe Blog said:

Who shoots a laptop, anyhow?
February 27, 2007 8:53
 

redreaper said:

buy ps3 for games, masta??? ur kidding right? Have you heard of Bioshock, Mass Effect, Forza 2, Fable 2, Halo 3, Blue Dragon, OR Lost Odyssey? Only one of those games is a true FPS (Halo 3 for those of you keeping track(Bioshock is a FPS but with a LOT of horror and RPG elements)). PS3 has Heavenly Sword, Metal Gear Solid 4, DMC4, Final Fantasy 13 and Gran Turismo HD(or 4 or whatever they are calling it now) That isnt bad on the PS3 end, but im DEFFINITELY sure I be enjoying my Xbox 360 for more than its online component.
March 8, 2007 9:14 PM
 

dan said:

give it one year everyone's bashing the ps3 it IS just propoganda most of it.

GIVE IT ONE YEAR MAYBE EVEN LESS!!! GTA4 AND METAL GEAR 4 ARE OUT IN OCTOBER
March 20, 2007 11:24
 

Gizmo Cafe Blog said:

According to the source, the new unit is indeed on its way, boasting a 120GB hard drive, HDMI port, and even HDMI cable.  
March 20, 2007 1:13 PM
 

Gizmo Cafe Blog said:

Despite the console’s missing media features – what do you expect for $250 – it does include a web browser, and may soon supplement the experience with a Wii Keyboard, or what we’re affectionately calling, “Wiiboard”.

April 24, 2007 2:12 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Brando

Brando's been gaming a long time. From Atari to NES to Genesis to, sigh, Game Gear, to PC to N64 to PS1 to Xbox to PS2 to Xbox 360, he's wasted a lot of time. But, isn't that the meaning of life?