Sony Set to Offer $599 Blu-ray Player (and it's not the PlayStation 3)

One of the best reasons to completely steer clear of Blu-ray has been the format's cost, with players reaching into the upper stratosphere of home theater costs.  Previously, Samsung's entry level player, the BD-P1000, has been priced in accordance with its name, costing consumers $1,000 or more.  More recent Blu-ray players, like Sony's BDP-S1, have been just as posh, making the PlayStation 3 ($600) about the only way to get even close to Blu-ray playback for a reasonable price.  That's about to change, with Sony offering an equally cheap stand-alone player, the BDP-S300, as a replacement to the more expensive BDP-S1.

Up until January, HD DVD movie and hardware sales easily trumped Blu-ray figures via Toshiba's reasonably priced $499 high definition player.  In addition, Xbox 360 owners found a rather affordable path to next-gen movies through an inexpensive $199 HD DVD add-on.  Cost and comparable picture quality kept HD DVD on top through the 2006 holiday season.

That's changed.  Blu-ray recently surpassed HD DVD in movie sales, largely as the result of a full-on charge of title releases.  Sony is clearly hoping its new BDP-S300 player, priced at $599, will compound HD DVD's pain.

So, what does the BDP-S300 offer?  No concessions, it seems.  In fact, Sony's new, cheaper player boasts everything the $1,000 BDP-S1 did, in addition to a smaller, more lightweight frame and the ability to play compact discs.

Despite Blu-ray's gains on HD DVD, the next-gen high definition movie age is taking its time in enveloping the mainstream.  Sony clearly hopes a few hundred extra bucks makes all the difference.

Shop Now for Blu-ray
1 comments
Posted by MATT. on August 28,2007 at 12:56 PM

Why would anyone spend the same amount of money to buy just the Blue-ray player portion of a PS3 and not just get a PS3?

I could understand this if the stand-alone player was like a hundred bucks cheaper than the PS3 or something... but this is just silly.