Gizmo Cafe Blog

CBS News Stumbles Over Music Piracy

Here at GizmoCafe.com, we’ve often reported on the legal beagle actions of the Record Industry Association of America, or RIAA.  Fellow blogger Wayde likens them to brain-eating zombies.  However, CBS News recently featured a story starring its own decrepit, moaning opinion of the fight over music piracy.  Leading the undead parade was CBS business correspondent Anthony Mason, who unwound a tidy little two minute time-filler about the impact of illegal downloads by American college students.

 

According to Mason, college students “used to be the music industry’s best customers; now they’re its biggest pirates.”

 

True, college-aged students – those with the least money to purchase $15 compact discs featuring two good songs – are most likely to download illegal music.  However, they’re also the most likely to filter the little money they have back into the artists they love.

 

A 2005 study by the Entertainment Research Group revealed that 35% of music consumers downloaded their songs from completely legal web services like Yahoo, iTunes, or the re-vamped Napster.  While 40% still pursued the illegal variety, the group performing the study expects – considering the momentum of pay sites – that the popularity of legal music downloads will shortly overcome.

 

In the period since 2005, iTunes popularity has only grown.  So too have other services, which soak up the music fans lost at sea after the termination of illegal protocols like Napster and Kazaa.  Studies have found that 63% of US kids who refuse to download illegal music cite computer virus threats as their main deterrent, evidence that America’s youth are more and more willing to pay for safe digital media.

 

So, what does Mason prove?

 

Not much.  In fact, there’s little new evidence in his report, which could just as easily have been broadcast five or six years ago, during Metallica’s public rant against the original Napster. 

 

If you want a fine example of CBS’ antiquated approach to music piracy, just consider the artists Mason cites as highly downloaded: Bruce Springsteen, Miles Davis, Buddy Holly, Avril Lavigne.  Is this still about the impact of college students, or their parents and grade school siblings?

 

Clearly, music piracy has shifted from the protocols of yesterday to open source giants like Bit Torrent.  However, considering the lifelong (albeit sometimes rocky) marriage between college-aged Americans and the music industry, Anthony Mason’s misguided story seems completely unwarranted.

Published Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:37 PM by Brando

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

Dooger said:

Music downloading is gonna kill the music industry. People started downloading everything, so now no label will ever take a risk on anything that requires a significant investment. Thus, we get disposable cookie-cutter bands designed to sell just enough albums to be profitable. These crappy albums only turn potential consumers even more against buying music, which leads to more crappy albums. It's a ***-cycle.

April 11, 2007 2:15 PM
 

modmonkee said:

I agree that this all seems a tad fishy, although I do download all my music, I try to give back by going to as many shows as possible.

April 11, 2007 2:29 PM
 

modsuperstar said:

The problem with the RIAA is that they will never get it.  They sell a commodity, not a product.  People are unwilling to pay what they are charging, yet they've continued to charge what they always have.  People don't view music as valuable anymore.  Since the Napster era it has simply become disposable.  Personally I'm willing to buy albums, but only if they are a good deal.  Even at iTunes price of $.99 I find it too expensive for what I am willing to pay. The RIAA really only exists still because they've been able to rehash the same content in a different format to consumers for over 30 years now.  Now with the advent of digital media these songs can essentially live on forever.  I have some mp3s that are 10 years old now and have migrated through 3 computers.  The new media format gravy train is over for them.  The RIAA will eventually die as things like iTunes make it easier for artists to cut the middle man right out of the loop with regards to music distribution.

April 11, 2007 2:40 PM
 

Wayde said:

CBS is owned by Viacom who is currently suing YouTube under the Digital Millennium COpyright Act of 1998 or DMCA ...

http://www.gizmocafe.com/blogs/gizmo_cafe_blog/archive/2007/03/16/111083.aspx

... this is the same Congressional Act the RIAA cites when suing the pants off families with children accused of filesharing.

I think Viacom is coming out as an RIAA ally, supporter of DMCA and opponent of "Fair Use". Facists!

April 11, 2007 4:11 PM
 

Mark said:

What troubles me about all this is that those who advocate free downloads often tout some kind of ‘honor system’ for paying the artists back, which is complete bollocks. “I try to give back by going to as many shows as possible” as justification for theft is a bit spurious in my books.

Considering that I’ve never written a song before and have no idea what kind of work goes into it, I find iTunes to be a good compromise when it comes to compensating artists. 99 cents isn’t unreasonable and I like the fact that I don’t have to buy a whole album if I don’t want to. I’m all for cutting out the middle man, but that presupposes the record labels don’t offer any added value to musicians’ careers: and when it comes to things like distribution, promotion and touring, the big celebs might argue that they actually do.

April 12, 2007 10:07 AM
 

mashall246law said:

Considering that I’ve never written a song before and have no idea what kind of work goes into it, I find iTunes to be a good compromise when it comes to compensating artists. 99 cents isn’t unreasonable and I like the fact that I don’t have to buy a whole album if I don’t want to. I’m all for cutting out the middle man, but that presupposes the record labels don’t offer any added value to musicians’ careers: and when it comes to things like distribution, promotion and touring, the big celebs might argue that they actually do.

April 13, 2007 2:03 AM
 

mason mi parade said:

June 27, 2008 4:45 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit

About Brando

Brando's been gaming a long time. From Atari to NES to Genesis to, sigh, Game Gear, to PC to N64 to PS1 to Xbox to PS2 to Xbox 360, he's wasted a lot of time. But, isn't that the meaning of life?