<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.gizmocafe.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sony Set to Offer $599 Blu-ray Player (and it’s not the PlayStation 3)</title><link>http://www.gizmocafe.com/blogs/gizmo_cafe_blog/archive/2007/02/27/108645.aspx</link><description>Sony is clearly hoping its new BDP-S300 player, priced at $599, will compound HD DVD’s pain.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>re: Sony Set to Offer $599 Blu-ray Player (and it’s not the PlayStation 3)</title><link>http://www.gizmocafe.com/blogs/gizmo_cafe_blog/archive/2007/02/27/108645.aspx#126185</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:56:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">173b0a64-840a-4ba0-afe6-d77867afd09b:126185</guid><dc:creator>MATT.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why would anyone spend the same amount of money to buy just the Blue-ray player portion of a PS3 and not just get a PS3?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I could understand this if the stand-alone player was like a hundred bucks cheaper than the PS3 or something... but this is just silly.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>